Discussion outputs

The following came from the afternoon group discussions.

Q1: What makes a perfect read list? And how can an academic keep it relevant?

Q2: Who should be involved in the development of a reading list and what are their roles?

Q3: Who do you want to view a reading list and who don’t you want to see it?

Q4: How do you get your whole institution engaged with reading lists?

Q5: Is there a formula that describes the relationship between reading list content and library stock?

Q6: What other systems does a resource/reading list management system need interact with and why?

One thought on “Discussion outputs

  1. Pingback: Meeting the Reading List Challenge workshop

Comments are closed.