Skip to content

Menu

Copyright Teaching and Learning Blog 2023 | Theme by ThemeinProgress | Proudly powered by WordPress

Teaching and Learning BlogIncorporating the E-learning Blog

Evaluating the quality of web resources

March 6, 2013Digital literacy, Evaluation, Standards, Tools, Turnitin Standard

TurnItIn have released two new tools to support the evaluation of web-based resources; a review of the sources actually used and an interactive tool for the evaluation of resources.  These should be useful as tutorial-level discussion pieces and lend some objectivity to assessing the worth of the Web.

“Open access to this new interactive rubric helps educators teach students proper research and source evaluation.

Turnitin worked with educators to develop The Source Educational Evaluation Rubric (SEER), an interactive rubric to analyze and grade the academic quality of Internet sources used by students in their writing. Instructors and students who use SEER can quickly evaluate a website and arrive at a single score based on five criteria scaled to credibility: Authority, Educational Value, Intent, Originality, and Quality.

“Recent research shows that students rely heavily on websites of questionable academic value,” said Jason Chu, senior education manager for Turnitin. “We believe that widespread usage of SEER will help educators teach students the importance of using quality resources in their research.”

This interactive rubric, when opened in Adobe Reader, allows you to adjust criteria weight and simply click to score each criterion with a rubric score and percentage automatically calculated.”

1) What’s wrong with Wikipedia?

2) The Source Educational Evaluation Rubric (SEER tool)

Categories

  • Academic misconduct
  • Academic skills
  • Accessibility
  • Adobe Connect
  • AR
  • Assessment
  • Assessment and feedback
  • Audio
  • Blackboard Collaborate
  • Blended learning
  • BoB Box of Broadcasts
  • Camtasia
  • Case Studies
  • Co-Tutor
  • Collaboration
  • Comment piece
  • Communications
  • Conferences
  • Copyright
  • CPD
  • Current Projects
  • Digital literacy
  • Distance learning
  • E-portfolios
  • Electronic Voting
  • Elluminate
  • Employability
  • Engagement
  • Evaluation
  • Events
  • Excellence in Teaching and Learning
  • Facebook
  • Feedback
  • Fieldwork
  • Flipped classroom
  • Funding
  • Futurelearn
  • Gamification
  • General
  • Groupwork
  • HE trends
  • HEA
  • Images
  • Informal learning
  • Innovation
  • iPads
  • JISC
  • Learn
  • Lecture capture
  • LectureTools
  • Lecturing to large groups
  • Make History timelines
  • Microsoft Teams
  • Minimum Presence
  • Mobile devices
  • Module and curriculum design
  • MOOCs
  • Moodle
  • New lecturers
  • NSS
  • OER
  • OMR
  • Online marking
  • Online submission
  • PDP
  • Pedagogic
  • Pedagogic research
  • Pedagogy
  • Peer Support
  • Personal tutoring
  • Plagiarism
  • Podcasting
  • Programme Reps
  • QR codes
  • Quiz
  • Reports
  • Research into e-learning
  • Researchers
  • ReVIEW (Echo 360)
  • RiTA
  • RITAs
  • Screen recording
  • Second Life
  • Smartpens
  • Social media
  • Staff Development
  • Standards
  • Strategy
  • Student-led curriculum
  • Support for students
  • Tablets
  • Teaching Awards
  • Teaching excellence
  • Teaching Innovation Awards
  • Teaching methods
  • Teaching room technologies
  • Teaching rooms
  • TechWatch
  • Tools
  • Turnitin
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • Vacancies
  • Vevox
  • Vice Chancellor's Award
  • Video
  • Web 2.0
  • Web Conferencing
  • WebPA
  • widening participation