Skip to content

Menu

Copyright Teaching and Learning Blog 2025 | Theme by ThemeinProgress | Proudly powered by WordPress

Teaching and Learning BlogIncorporating the E-learning Blog

Value for money? Student perceptions

February 26, 2014HE trends, Reports Standard

Every winter the Government sets out the annual funding for higher education in a letter to HEFCE. This letter outlines the funds that are available for allocation, alongside any government priorities. One of the priorities in the latest letter is that the sector makes greater progress in delivering efficiencies, as “students will rightly expect value for the fees they pay”.

A question arising from this is what do students define as value for money?

An insight is provided by a research project led by Dr Camille Kandiko from King’s College London. The project aimed to explore the views of students entering higher education in the UK in 2012-13, and to investigate their perceptions and expectations about the quality of their learning experience and the academic standards of their chosen programmes of study.

In regard to value for money, the report identified three criteria used by students:

Embodiment of value: Contact time
The primary way students referenced issues of quality and value in their degree was through contact time.

Tangible value: Resources
The resources the institution offered and what additional costs students faced were summarised as ‘what do you get for what you pay’.

Return on investment
The reputational value of a degree, their subject and that of the institution.

Categories

  • Academic misconduct
  • Academic skills
  • Accessibility
  • Adobe Connect
  • AR
  • Assessment
  • Assessment and feedback
  • Audio
  • Blackboard Collaborate
  • Blended learning
  • BoB Box of Broadcasts
  • Camtasia
  • Case Studies
  • Co-Tutor
  • Collaboration
  • Comment piece
  • Communications
  • Conferences
  • Copyright
  • CPD
  • Current Projects
  • Digital literacy
  • Distance learning
  • E-portfolios
  • Electronic Voting
  • Elluminate
  • Employability
  • Engagement
  • Evaluation
  • Events
  • Excellence in Teaching and Learning
  • Facebook
  • Feedback
  • Fieldwork
  • Flipped classroom
  • Funding
  • Futurelearn
  • Gamification
  • General
  • Groupwork
  • HE trends
  • HEA
  • Images
  • Informal learning
  • Innovation
  • iPads
  • JISC
  • Learn
  • Lecture capture
  • LectureTools
  • Lecturing to large groups
  • Make History timelines
  • Microsoft Teams
  • Minimum Presence
  • Mobile devices
  • Module and curriculum design
  • MOOCs
  • Moodle
  • New lecturers
  • NSS
  • OER
  • OMR
  • Online marking
  • Online submission
  • PDP
  • Pedagogic
  • Pedagogic research
  • Pedagogy
  • Peer Support
  • Personal tutoring
  • Plagiarism
  • Podcasting
  • Programme Reps
  • QR codes
  • Quiz
  • Reports
  • Research into e-learning
  • Researchers
  • ReVIEW (Echo 360)
  • RiTA
  • RITAs
  • Screen recording
  • Second Life
  • Smartpens
  • Social media
  • Staff Development
  • Standards
  • Strategy
  • Student-led curriculum
  • Support for students
  • Tablets
  • Teaching Awards
  • Teaching excellence
  • Teaching Innovation Awards
  • Teaching methods
  • Teaching room technologies
  • Teaching rooms
  • TechWatch
  • Tools
  • Turnitin
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • Vacancies
  • Vevox
  • Vice Chancellor's Award
  • Video
  • Web 2.0
  • Web Conferencing
  • WebPA
  • widening participation

Recent Posts

  • New Office 365 training service
  • Celebrating the RiTA and TIA Award Winners for 2020
  • 5 Top tips for Microsoft Teams
  • Using the new leaderboard feature in Vevox
  • Tips and Tricks for using Office 365

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org